The Cost of Discipleship

As we have discussed in this blog and in my book, there are many passages in the Bible which requires we do more than just believe in Jesus and his death for our sins in order to be saved.  Unlike many, Dietrich Bonhoeffer dealt with these Biblical passages rather than ignoring them.  While I do not think he would agree with all my conclusions, Bonhoeffer does criticize the view that all we need to do is to give intellectual assent to Jesus and his work for our sins.  He terms such a view as “cheap grace”. [1]  Cheap grace is a grace that costs us nothing.  It is a grace that means I can sin as much as I like knowing that God’s grace will cover me. [2]

Why does Bonhoeffer believe grace is costly?  If we are disciples of Christ, we must bear the sins of others [3] which means we are to “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.” (Galatians 6:2 ESV)  Paul and Jesus both state that we should be willing to be wronged (suffer financially, suffer the loss of a right) rather than bring a suit in court against a fellow Christian (Matthew 5:40 and I Corinthians 6:7).  We must face the call of Christ alone because Christ has told us, we must be willing to leave our families and give up our lives to follow Christ (Luke 14:26) [4].  The call of Christ requires a complete breach with the world. [5]  That God requires more of us than just to believe is without question if one considers what the whole Bible says about salvation.

Bonhoeffer believed the Reformation rightly taught that grace alone can save but left out the obligations of discipleship.  As a result, cheap grace entered our theology [6] and we Christians are more like the world than like Christ.

__________________________

[1]   Dietrich Bonhoeffer.  The Cost of Discipleship.  Translated by R. H. Fuller.  New York:  Touchstone Book, 1995, p. 43.

[2]   Bonhoeffer, p. 50.

[3]   Bonhoeffer, p. 90.

[4]   Bonhoeffer, p. 94.

[5]    Bonhoeffer, p. 96.

[6]   Bonhoeffer, pp. 49-50.

Posted in Salvation | Leave a comment

I don’t know about your impression of the Old Testament prophets, but to me they seem to be more like John the Baptist who wore a “garment of camel’s hair and a leather belt around his waist, and his food was locusts and wild honey”.  And he preached in the wilderness. (Matthew 3:1-4)  Or take Elijah who when threatened by Jezebel felt safer escaping to the wilderness (1 Kings 19:8).  But in reading the Old Testament, this view is not always accurate.  Some of them were very well connected.

Elisha evidently had a considerable amount of influence over other prophets.  2 Kings 6 tells us the sons of the prophets asked Elisha for permission to build a new residence for themselves.

Elisha evidently was well traveled.  The Shunammite woman built him a room where Elisha could stay whenever he passed that way.

Elijah was known throughout the region of Israel because he anointed the king of Syria (1 Kings 19).  Elisha was also known by the king of Syria who asked him if he would recover from an illness (2 Kings 8:7-9).

When Naaman came to Israel to be cured of his leprosy, the king of Israel tore his clothes because he thought the king of Syria was sending Naaman to start a quarrel with him (2 Kings 5).  How did Elisha hear the king of Israel tore his clothes unless he was well connected to what happened in the palace?

Even Elisha’s servant talked to the king of Israel about the deeds of Elisha 2 Kings 8).  One does not gossip with the king unless there is some close connection there.

On second thought, that the Old Testament prophets were well connected should not be a surprise.  To influence a society, we must participate in that society.

Posted on by admin | Leave a comment

Preserving a Political Position

I have been reading through the Old Testament recently and was struck again by the way God has worked in history.  One example is Naaman who was the commander of the army of the king of Syria.  The Bible tells us that God gave victory to Syria through the military skill of Naaman.  (2 Kings 5:1 ESV)  This is another example of God working through nations other than the nation of Israel.

But Naaman had a problem—he was a leper.  Through a captive Israeli child, Naaman learned of the prophet Elisha who could cure his leprosy.  Naaman visits Elisha and eventually complies with the instructions Elisha gives him and is cured (2 Kings 5:8-11).

Then Naaman makes a request of Elisha which is not a big surprise.  The surprise is the response Elisha gives him.

“’. . .for from now on your servant will not offer burnt offering or sacrifice to any god but the Lord .  In this matter may the Lord  pardon your servant: when my master goes into the house of Rimmon to worship there, leaning on my arm, and I bow myself in the house of Rimmon, when I bow myself in the house of Rimmon, the Lord  pardon your servant in this matter.’  He said to him, ‘Go in peace.’” (2 Kings 5:17-19 ESV)

So why would God (since Elisha was a prophet of God it implies that Elisha’s response has God’s approval) allow someone to bow down before other idols just to preserve his political position?

An answer is given to us by the apostle Paul—God overlooked people’s worship of idols because of their ignorance.

“Being then God’s offspring, we ought not to think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and imagination of man.  The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent,” (Acts 17:29-30 ESV)

These passages raise two questions in my mind.

First, after Naaman talked to Elisha, he was no longer ignorant of God’s requirements.  In fact Naaman tells Elisha he no longer will offer any sacrifice to any other god.  So why did God allow Naaman to bow before idols in order to preserve his political position?

Second, if God overlooked the worship of idols because of people’s ignorance in times past, why would he not do the same in our present age?  Does not the Bible teach that people will be judged based upon the knowledge they have?  Did not Jesus say if he had not spoken to people they would not be guilty of sin (John 15:22-24)?  Does not Paul instruct us that without the law there is no sin because it is through the law that we become conscious of sin (Romans 3:20 and Romans 5:13)?

Maybe we need to rethink how  God works in our world.

Posted in God's Sovereignty | Leave a comment

The Entire Bible

As I stated in my last blog, we are discussing prayer at the church I attend.  What caught my attention was that there are many verses in the Bible which simply instruct us to pray.  These verses have no preconditions or requirements or instructions on what we are to do other than to pray.  For example:

“Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.  For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened.” (Matthew 7:7-9 ESV)

However, there are at least 20 verses in the Bible that teach our prayers will only be effective if we conform to God’s will; do something besides pray.  For example:

“We know that God does not listen to sinners, but if anyone is a worshiper of God and does his will, God listens to him.” (John 9:31-32 ESV)

So does God place a condition on whether he answers our prayers or is he more concerned that we just pray?  The Bible seems to give us different answers.  Why does God seem to confuse this issue?

This question is similar to the problem we noted in our discussion on salvation.  We can pick out a verse or two out of the Bible and prove just about any idea we have about a particular subject, including prayer.  That approach makes it very easy for us but to really know what God is saying to us, we must consider what the entire Bible says.

Posted in Application | Leave a comment

Purpose of Prayer

In the church that I attend, we have been talking about prayer.  For me, prayer raises a lot of questions such as:  If God is all-knowing, why does he need us to talk to him in prayer?  He knows more about us than we do ourselves.  Another question is:  Does our prayer really change anything because John tells us “. . .if we ask anything according to his will he hears us.  And if we know that he hears us in whatever we ask, we know that we have the requests that we have asked of him.”  (1 John 5:14-15 ESV)  So whatever we ask must be according to God’s will, not our will which appears to mean what we want does not matter.

The preacher at our church made a comment about prayer this last Sunday that addresses some of these questions.  He stated that God is more concerned about how we respond to circumstances in which we find ourselves than he is in giving us what we ask for in our prayers.  The purpose of prayer is to align our will with his.

We said something similar in our blog of November 12, 2017 when we wrote about the book of Ecclesiastes.  Now most people interpret this book as describing what life is like without Christ.  Well, life can be meaningless with or without Christ.  It is not the fleeting moments of our lives that concern God but rather the decisions we make during these fleeting moments  The reason is because those decisions will impact our soul and our soul lives for eternity while the momentary circumstances of our life are so temporary..

Most of our prayers ask God to remove us from the difficult situations in which we find ourselves.  God’s concern is us, not the circumstances in which we find ourselves.

Posted in Application | Leave a comment

Differences

Ri Le runs a very successful restaurant business and I have been a patron at his restaurant many times.  In a recent newspaper article about him, Ri Le states one of the most important moments in his life occurred 25 years ago when he attended a five-day retreat by a Vietnamese Buddhist monk.  This meeting changed his life. [1]

So if other religions can have a profound impact on people’s lives, what makes Christianity different from other religions?  One answer is that we have different beliefs.  However, as we have demonstrated in this blog and in my book (see pages 55 to 57), we are finite and that means our beliefs are not totally accurate and they are not totally under our control (what we believe depends largely upon the culture in which we were brought up).

Other Christians maintain that changed lives are evidence of Christianity’s validity.  As we have stated in the blog before “the only way we can truly know our sins are forgiven is if we have a changed life” (see January 13, 2019 posting).  However, as we have seen above, other religions can change people’s lives as well.  So are they valid?

Other Christians maintain that Christianity is a relationship with God.  So can a person of another religion have a relationship with God?  True, some of their beliefs are different than what is taught in the Bible but in looking at the history of Christianity, we see that Christians have held erroneous beliefs as well.  So it is apparent that just because someone holds erroneous beliefs that does not preclude them from having a relationship with God.

So what makes Christianity different from other religions?

_______________________________

[1]   Scott Cherry,  “Ri Le fuels success in Tulsa”.  Tulsa World, January 27, 2019, p. D3.

Posted in Application | Leave a comment

North Korea Christians

The Christians in North Korea face a most difficult situation.  They face prison, torture, and even death for their faith.  Conditions are so severe that:  “Most of North Korea’s Christians do not engage in the extremely dangerous work of proselytizing. . .Instead, they largely keep their beliefs to themselves or within their immediate families.” [1]  Our hearts go out to them and I do hope that we regularly include them in our prayers.

While we sympathize with the Christians of North Korea, I would like to discuss those in North Korea who are not Christians.  As mentioned above, even hearing of Christ in North Korea is difficult because of a government which does all it can to stamp out Christianity.  So if our doctrine of salvation is true, those North Koreans who have experienced the hell of living in North Korea will, after they die, have the opportunity to experience the real hell.  Is this fair?  Yes, they, like all of us, are sinful creatures and we all deserve the punishment of hell but God has provided a way that we can avoid this fate.  So why does God make this way so readily available to some and so difficult to find for others?

The non-Christians of North Korea, who are no different from others throughout the world, demonstrate to me we need to rethink our doctrine of salvation.

__________________________

[1]   Hyung-Jin Kim, “N. Korean Christians keep faith underground”, Tulsa World, February 3, 2019, p. A15.

Posted in Salvation | Leave a comment

Square Circles

So many times I have heard someone ask:   Can God make a square circle?  The intent of asking this question is to demonstrate God cannot do everything; that he is not omnipotent.  It is an effort to bring God down to our size.

However, once again, the problem is not with God but with our finite human reasoning.  An appropriate response when we are asked if God can make a square circle should be:  “this is not an inability in God but rather an incoherence in the task proposed.” [1].

___________________________

[1]   E. S. Brightman as quoted in John Hick.  Evil and the God of Love.  New York:  Palgrave-Macmillan, 2010, p.32.

Posted in God's Sovereignty | Leave a comment

Robert Allen Coy

He was an honor student in high school and excelled in sports.  He was a World War II veteran serving in Korea.  He married Naomi and together they raised 10 children.  He was a farmer for most of his life.  He occasionally preached at a local church.

He was the hardest working man that I knew and he passed on this passion to many of his descendants.  He loved telling stories, sometimes the same ones over and over, always laughing as if he were telling them for the first time.

Robert Allen Coy was my father-in-law and he went to meet our God this year.  When someone passes from this life to the next, we often say:  ”rest in peace”.  I doubt if Robert is resting in heaven.  He was too much a man of action.

Posted in Application | Leave a comment

A Changed Life

Several years ago in a philosophy class I was taking, a fellow classmate gave me a list of three books he suggested that I read.   Well, I finally got around to reading one of those books.  It was a book about the Existential philosophy.  This branch of philosophy emphasizes that we must deal with the reality of human existence, with “the concrete life of ordinary mankind” [1] and not just some theoretical concepts.  The author defines Existentialism as the attempt to bring the whole man, all of him, into philosophy. [2]  He also criticizes mainstream philosophy  because it teaches detachment as a path to wisdom instead of the Hebraic tradition which teaches commitment and “the passionate involvement of man with his own moral being”. [3]  The existential philosopher Kierkegaard states that religious truth is not a truth of the intellect but a truth that “must penetrate my personal experience or it is nothing”. [4]

The philosophers called the Greco-Roman moralists had the same view.  They were more concerned about what it means to be human and how we should live than they were about theoretical concepts [5].  They thought philosophers should teach as much through the example of their lives as their words. [6]

That is what we have been emphasizing in this blog.  The concept of salvation in Christianity involves the changing of our soul so it is like God; it is not just some theoretical exercise.  It is more than a set of beliefs—our doctrine.  It is more than finding reasons for the validity of our faith—apologetics.  Does not the Bible tell us it is a changed life?  “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation.  The old has passed away; behold, the new has come”.  (2 Corinthians 5:17 ESV).

A few Sundays ago our pastor summed it up when he stated that the only way we can truly say we are Christians and the only way we can truly know our  sins are forgiven is if we have a changed life.  Christianity must impact our entire life or it is not Christianity.  The same can be applied to any philosophy or religion.  If our philosophy or religion does not have an impact on our lives, what is the purpose of holding those beliefs?

___________________________

[1]   William Barrett, Irrational Man.  New York:   Anchor Books, 1958, p. 135.

[2]   Barrett, p. 275.

[3]   Barrett. p. 77.

[4]   Barrett, p. 171.

[5]   Luke Timothy Johnson, Practical Philosophy:  The Greco-Roman Moralists (Part 1).  Chantilly, VA:  The Teaching Company, 2002, p. 9.

[6]   Johnson, p. 67.

Posted in Application | Leave a comment